Indonesia inputs
General Input
- Indonesians ignore problems wait them out [Hindu world view about
detachment / lack of progress potential]
- Wrong to be seen to stand out creates jealousies [though shall not covert
God respects the humble cant take it with you]
- Many have degrees of uncertain quality [note Argentina where unreal
expectations that worthy of great things without performance]
- Little commercial capability in Yogja [statist approach is thus dangerous
dont trust own judgment until build stronger commercial capabilities in
community] this may be what is behind decentralization in addition to
regional separatist aspirations which can be thus defused cf NQ New State
movement.
George Marantika
- Indonesia is third largest democracy in the world
- Now totally free speech
- 40% unemployment
- people losing interest in education
- informal economy growing
- IMF mistakes people still want subsidies (on ??? rice ?) people expect
leadership to show contribution
- Taxes high
- Most economists wont say anything [to protect jobs??]
- Australia easy to defend Indonesia hard
Nur Achmad Afandi
- Gus Dur Party
- Vice Chairman of Provincial Parliament (equi Governor)
- Economics / Philosophy degrees
- Business
- On Board Chamber of commerce
- Friend of Sultan will convey ideas to Sultan
- Coordinator of Economic Policy in Parliament
- REQUESTED info which is analysis of economic problems from Indonesian point
of view
Key issue for government is centralization / decentralization Unique policy involves
decentralization under provincial umbrella. Central
government has little influence on social development
- Government wants to map economic potential realistically and combine with
leadership to differentiate economy [there is no real limit to economic
potential]
- Yogja is cultural centre human resources OK people listen to their leaders
[note argentina parallel]
- Weakness in that natural resources are poor [resources curse]
- Pop = 3.2 m 30% handicraft; 21% farming; 35% services large informal economy
- Land earns 10m R / ha / annum average holding Ό ha thus income 2.5m R/annum.
People cant live on farming 200,000 R/ month ($A40)
- AVERAGE OFFICE WORKER 600,000 R / month ($A 120)
- Potential from southern beach 110km fish but tradition is not as fishermen
only work 4 hr / day
- Handicraft potential OK but weak access to markets, technology and financing
- Liquidity of banks is weak traffic 7.6tr R / annum, but 1.7tr R is reinvested
- Budget is limitation 354bn R / annum 311 of which is committed to salaries
[this is always so need not be problem as key initiatives can be
inexpensive with high multipliers back to taxes what is the tax base? ways
to improv resources via accounting for assets but must be sure that can spend
the money well]
- There is a program to 2010 recovery of peoples economy ; build coop with
business (110km of coastline for agribusiness where big co (Sam Poerna
cigars) is investing heavily
- Also 147 sub-districts credit institutions for small enterprises capital only
12bn R ($2m) this is one area where Australia could really help [note need
for info at same time]
It is not hard to deal with province [this can be problem Qld]
Michael Noakes
- no willingness to take responsibility - prefer to discuss and gain
consensus. No accountability;
- lack of order (product of multiple cultures) - everyone drives into
intersections - gridlock - too 5 hours to clear cars parked at event for
80,000 people
- army imposed order under soeharto - authoritarian way
- everyone has to push for themselves - no one considers others
- Dutch did not leave good legal system, honest PS, good infrastructure
RANDOM
Paul Krugman advanced the hypothesis that countries in
SE Asia were growing rapidly by increasing inputs with limited contributions to
growth from increasing productivity - and that this pattern (which corresponded
to that of the Soviet Union in the 1950s) was unsustainable.
System depends on big men traditionally highly stratified society Hinduism
then exploited by Dutch
Indonesia needs to believe in themselves - need
assurance rather than uncertainty
note issue of 'why not grow own food'
cities concentrate information and thus people -
consider how information access can be de-concentrated.
emphasis in SMEs - do not involve the strongest
individuals or firms in developmental efforts - but rather those with some
potential who have not 'made it yet'. This will create a broader base of social
capital improve equity.
growth will necessarily involve using more energy (as
energy consumption tends to parallel GDP growth). Thus clean energy sources are
a priority.
consider strategy of differentiating products and
services - for higher value added. Also must be market oriented. Development of
cluster of functions makes it hard to copy.
trading company options - note role of Japanese trading
companies involved 'intelligence gathering and organizing' - if follow Chinese
trading strategy of low margins to ensure supply continuity - works through
sepcific channels - but not universal - alternative is not rip-off but offering
more diverse products. The world can't afford high volume, low value products -
too much environmental impact. Need fewer more valued items
the ideal of 'nobility' could be considered - seems to
be the concept underpinning Kraton - but don't expect only a few leaders to be
perfect. If depend on leaders, their failure is failure of whole society
information into Indonesia matters - and may not be
available unless respect IP
Government In Australia GOCs are not OK. Consider China's path out of this problem area
Money is a bad master (and a terrible god) and needs to be made into a
servant. This is another issues that can be raised in global order context.
What is the ultimate goal - 'modernism' (with it high living standards) or something
else. Obstacles to modernism include:
- Environment - need forms of 'wealth' that do not conflict with
environment. Some progress is being made in this respect.
- Managing complexity
- Energy - which is linked. There is no shortage of energy in universe -
merely of energy in suitable forms - a problem that may be soluble
- Population
- Ineffectual institutions
- Cultural (and other such as political) constraints on economic performance which results in
'left-behind' peoples